(PC) Kindred v. Allenby et al, No. 1:2018cv00554 - Document 104 (E.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 102 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/13/2022. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:18-cv-00554-DAD-EPG (PC) v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. CORONA, (Doc. Nos. 100, 102) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Scott Kindred is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 19 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 16, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion requesting injunctive relief. (Doc. No. 100.) 22 Defendant did not file a response to plaintiff’s motion. On May 5, 2022, the assigned magistrate 23 judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion be denied. 24 (Doc. No. 102.) Those findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained 25 notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of 26 service. (Id. at 4.) To date, no objections have been filed with the court, and the time in which to 27 do so has since passed. 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, 5 1. 6 7 8 9 10 The findings and recommendations issued on May 4, 2022 (Doc. No. 102) are adopted; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 100) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 13, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
