(HC) Gonzales v. Matevousian, No. 1:2018cv00499 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Petitioner's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/5/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT GONZALES, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 1:18-cv-00499-DAD-SKO Petitioner, v. ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 19, 20) 17 18 Petitioner Robert Gonzales is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304. 21 On July 9, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 22 recommending that petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 20.) The 23 findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that any objections 24 thereto were to be filed within thirty days after service. (Id. at 2.) To date, no objections to the 25 findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has 27 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds 28 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. 3 4 5 6 7 The findings and recommendations issued on July 9, 2018 (Doc. No. 20) are adopted in full; and 2. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
