(PC) Renteria v. Matharu et al, No. 1:2018cv00497 - Document 32 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief; ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/21/19. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS RENTERIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. KABIR MATHARU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 1:18-cv-00497-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 31.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF No. 28.) 17 18 19 20 21 Luis Renteria (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 22 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 23 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 24 On April 18, 2019, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 25 plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on April 15, 2019, be denied. (ECF No. 26 31.) 27 recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen-day time period for filing objections has now expired and 28 plaintiff has not filed objections or responded otherwise to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 5 1. 6 7 The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 18, 2019, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. 8 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on April 15, 2019, is DENIED. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ May 21, 2019 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.