(PC) Richardson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al, No. 1:2018cv00429 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 2 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Gregory Richardson. referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/25/2018. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY RICHARDSON, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 1:18-cv-0429 LJO JLT P Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 By an order filed May 21, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee in this action or 19 file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account 20 statement, and he was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 21 action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the 22 court’s order and has not paid the filing fee or filed the required documents. 23 Thus, the Court RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 1 1 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 2 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 3 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
