(PC) Petillo v. Galliger et al, No. 1:2018cv00217 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief as Moot, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/29/2018. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAIAH J. PETILLO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. GALLAGHER, et al., 15 Defendants. 1:18-cv-00217-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 15.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS MOOT 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Isaiah J. Petillo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 29, 2018, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 22 plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed as part of the Complaint on February 23 12, 2018 (ECF No. 1 at 8), be denied. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen days in 24 which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) The time for filing 25 objections has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed objections or responded otherwise to the 26 findings and recommendations. 27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 28 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 1 1 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 4 1. 5 6 The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 29, 2018, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. 7 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed as part of the Complaint on February 12, 2018, is DENIED. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ November 29, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.