(PC) Garcia v. Moreno et al, No. 1:2018cv00014 - Document 45 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER VACATING Evidentiary Hearing Set for January 23, 2019, to be Rescheduled If and When the Final Order Addressing the Findings and Recommendations is Issued, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/8/19. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LENIN GARCIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. E. MORENO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00014-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET FOR JANUARY 23, 2019, TO BE RESCHEDULED IF AND WHEN THE FINAL ORDER ADDRESSING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS ISSUED [ECF No. 43] Plaintiff Lenin Garcia is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On November 1, 2018, the undersigned Findings and Recommendations recommending that 21 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies be 22 denied, without prejudice. (Doc. No. 39.) The Court noted that Defendants could file a request for an 23 evidentiary hearing to resolve the disputed factual issues regarding exhaustion. (Id.) 24 On November 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 25 On November 29, 2018, Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff’s objections and a motion for 26 an evidentiary hearing. Defendants set the evidentiary hearing for January 26, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. 27 before the undersigned. 28 /// 1 Because the Findings and Recommendations have not yet been adopted by the assigned 1 2 District Judge, the setting of an evidentiary hearing is premature and the January 26, 2019, date is 3 HEREBY VACATED to be rescheduled if the Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full. 4 See Local Rule 304(f); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 January 8, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
