(PC) Darryl House v. Matevousian et al, No. 1:2017cv01698 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING Plaintiff's ; 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/9/18. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRYL HOUSE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:17-cv-01698-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF Nos. 4, 11] Plaintiff Darryl House is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 2, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 21 Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief be denied. The Findings 22 and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that were to be filed within 23 twenty-one days. No objections were filed and the time period to do has expired. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 25 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 26 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 2, 2018, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied as premature. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ April 9, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2