Arzamendi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:2017cv01485 - Document 43 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/3/18. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 DELORES ARZAMENDI, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 1:17-cv-01485-LJO-SKO DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 9 Defendant. 10 11 This case concerns pro se Plaintiff Delores Arzamendi’s case against Defendant Wells Fargo 12 Bank, N.A., for damages and equitable relief. Plaintiff filed her complaint in the Superior Court of 13 California in the County of Merced on October 3, 2017. ECF No. 1 at 9. On November 2, 2017, 14 Defendant removed the case to this Court. Id. at 1-2. On March 8, 2018, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s 15 complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 21. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on April 16 4, 2018. ECF No. 22. The Court dismissed the FAC on June 29, 2018, granting Plaintiff a final 17 opportunity to amend her complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff’s deadline came and went on July 30, 18 2018, and Plaintiff did not file an amendment complaint or request for extension. This case is therefore 19 DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to obey the Court’s order. The Clerk of Court is 20 directed to close this case. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ August 3, 2018 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
