(PC) Hisle v. Conanon, et al., No. 1:2017cv01400 - Document 97 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 92 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER DENYING 68 Defendant Conanan's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/18/2019. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS CURTIS HISLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. MARLYN CONANAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01400-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING DEFENDANT CONANAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF Nos. 68, 90, 92] 17 Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 31, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations 20 21 recommending that Defendant Conanan’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (ECF No. 92.) 22 The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections 23 were to be filed within thirty days. (Id.) On December 2, 2019, Defendant filed objections. (ECF No. 24 96.) 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 After reviewing the Defendant’s objections, the Court finds no basis to alter the Magistrate 2 Judge Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 3 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 4 entire file, including the Defendant’s objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations 5 to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 6 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on October 31, 2019, are adopted in full; 8 2. Defendant Conanan’s motion for summary judgment filed on June 17, 2019, is denied; and 9 10 3. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ December 18, 2019 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
