(PC) Rhey v. Ogbuehi et al, No. 1:2017cv00718 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, denying 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/17/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHOON RHEY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. INFEOMA OGBUEHI, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-00718-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF Nos. 8, 15] 17 18 Plaintiff Choon Rhey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights matter pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 21, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations 22 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to 23 restore his single-cell status be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff 24 and contained notice that objections were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 15.) More than thirty 25 days have passed, and no objections were filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. adopted in full; and 3 4 5 The Findings and Recommendations filed on September 21, 2017 (ECF No. 15) are 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order filed on June 22, 2017 (ECF No. 8) is denied. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: November 17, 2017 9 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.