(SS) Schaefers v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2017cv00648 - Document 30 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER regarding Plaintiff's Social Security Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/12/18. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 STACEY LYN SCHAEFERS, Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 Defendant. 14 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 19 20 The court, having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 13 15 Case No. 1:17-cv-0648-EPG For the reasons announced by the Court on the record at the conclusion of the parties’ oral argument on July 12, 2018, the Court finds that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is supported by substantial evidence, and the same is hereby affirmed. \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ 28 1 1 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 12, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.