(HC) Cliff v. Matevousian, No. 1:2017cv00641 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 13 Findings and Recommendations; denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment and referring back to Magistrate Judge signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/9/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTRONE CLIFF, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:17-cv-00641-DAD-JLT Petitioner, v. ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Respondent. 16 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REFERRING BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. Nos. 8, 13) 17 18 Petitioner is proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on May 18, 2017. 20 (Doc. No. 8.) On May 22, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 21 recommendations recommending petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. 22 No. 13). These findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice 23 that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days from the date of service. To 24 date, no party has filed objections, and the time in which to do so has passed. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the undersigned has 26 conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 undersigned concludes that the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported 28 by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 2 3 Given the foregoing: 1. The findings and recommendations issued May 22, 2017 (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in full; 4 2. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8) is denied; and 5 3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2