(PC) Valadez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, No. 1:2017cv00551 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending denial of 17 Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/30/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL VALADEZ, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 16 Case No. 1:17-cv-00551-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF Nos. 17, 20) Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Daniel Valadez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 6, 2017, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 21 Recommendations that Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed April 19, 2017, be denied, 22 without prejudice. (ECF No. 20.) Those Findings and Recommendations were served on 23 Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) 24 days after service. (Id. at 2–3.) More than fourteen days have passed and no objections have 25 bene filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 27 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 28 the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper 1 1 analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 5 The Findings and Recommendations issued on November 6, 2017, (ECF No. 20) are adopted in full; and 2. 6 Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, (ECF No. 17) is DENIED without prejudice. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ November 30, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2