Webb v. GSF Properties et al, No. 1:2017cv00361 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 5 Findings and Recommendations re Motions for IFP 2 , 4 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/4/17. Filing Fee Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACY WEBB, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:17-cv-00361-LJO-SAB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (ECF Nos. 2, 4) 14 GSF PROPERTIES, et al., 15 Defendants. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Tracy Webb filed the complaint in this action on March 13, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 29, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a findings and recommendations. The 21 findings and recommendations recommended denying Plaintiff’s application to proceed without 22 prepayment of fees. The findings and recommendations was served on Plaintiff and contained 23 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) 24 days from the date of service. The period for filing objections has passed and no objections have 25 been filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 27 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 28 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. FULL; 3 4 2. 3. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400.00 within thirty days from the date of service of this order; and 7 8 Plaintiff’s applications to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action are DENIED; 5 6 The findings and recommendations, filed March 29, 2017, is ADOPTED IN 4. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee in compliance with this order, this action shall be dismissed. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ May 4, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.