(PC) Williams v. Verna et al, No. 1:2016cv00764 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER DENYING 30 Motion for Summary Judgment ; ORDER ADOPTING 37 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/24/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON WILLIAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ANTHONY VERNA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00764-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF Nos. 30, 37] Plaintiff Shannon Williams, a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons 17 18 (“BOP”) proceeding pro se filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown 19 Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) on June 2, 2016. 20 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 22 Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. The 23 Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to 24 be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time to do so has passed. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on September 10, 2018, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on March 5, 2018, is denied. 3 4 and 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: October 24, 2018 8 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
