(PC) Johnson v. White, et al., No. 1:2016cv00710 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Denying Defendants' 17 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status, and Directing Defendants to File a Response to the Complaint within Thirty Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/26/2017. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCE EDWARD JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. C.O. WHITE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:16-cv-00710-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS [ECF Nos. 17, 23] Plaintiff Vince Edward Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 21 Recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis 22 status be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice 23 that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. 24 objections have been filed. Over fourteen days have passed and no 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 6, 2017, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is denied; and 4 3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall file a 5 response to the complaint. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ April 26, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2