(PC) Hall v. Frauenheim et al, No. 1:2016cv00263 - Document 34 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 25 Findings and Recommendations, Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief, 19 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/8/17. (Gonzalez, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 11 ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00263-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE ) RELIEF SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, et al., ) ) [ECF Nos. 19, 25] Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff Richard B. Hall is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 12 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 6 7 8 9 10 RICHARD B. HALL, 13 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 14 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 15 Recommendation which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed 16 within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on November 30, 2016. 17 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 18 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 19 Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on November 4, 2016, is adopted in full; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction is 23 denied. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: February 8, 2017 27 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
