(PC) Cowart v. Rahman et al, No. 1:2016cv00004 - Document 67 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting Findings and Recommendations 54 denying Plaintiff's Motion for Restraining Order / Injunctive Relief 53 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GARDELL COWART, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING PLAINTIFF=S MOTION FOR RESTRAINING ORDER/INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. RAHMAN, et al., 13 No. 1:16-cv-00004-AWI-SKO (PC) Defendants. (Docs. 53, 54) 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Gardell Cowart, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 9, 2018, 19 the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny a motion for temporary 20 restraining order/injunctive relief that Plaintiff filed on January 4, 2018. (Docs. 53, 54.) The 21 Findings and Recommendation allowed for filing of objections within twenty one days. (Id.) 22 Though more than the allowed time has passed, no objections have been filed. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 25 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued on January 9, 2018 (Doc. 54), is adopted 28 in full; and 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief/temporary restraining order, filed on January 4, 2018 (Doc. 53) is DENIED. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2018 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
