(HC)Mehmood v. Garcia et al, No. 1:2015cv01585 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER Reissuing the Magistrate Judge's January 25, 2016 Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 4 ), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/4/2016. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASIR MEHMOOD, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:15-cv-01585-DAD-MJS (HC) Petitioner, v. RYAN GARCIA, et al., Respondents. ORDER REISSUING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JANUARY 25, 2016 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. No. 4) 16 17 Plaintiff Yasir Mehmood, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 on October 16, 2015. (Doc. No. 1.) On January 25, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued 19 findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 be dismissed. (Doc. No. 4.) Those findings and recommendations contained notice that any 21 written objections were due within thirty days after service. (Id. at 4.) No objections were filed. 22 However, on January 27, 2016, the court received a notice of change of address from 23 petitioner indicating that he had been transferred at that his new address of record had changed to 24 “Nevada Southern Detention Center, 2190 E. Mesquite Ave., Pahrump, NV 89060.” 25 Accordingly, in order to ensure the petitioner received proper notice, the court will order that the 26 January 25, 2016 findings and recommendations be re-served on petitioner and will grant him 27 leave to file written objections, if any, to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days 28 of their re-service upon him at his current address of record. 1 1 2 For the reasons set forth above: 1) 3 recommendations (Doc. No. 4) on petitioner at his new address of record: 4 Nevada Southern Detention Center 2190 E. Mesquite Ave Pahrump, NV 89060 5 6 The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve the January 25, 2016 findings and 2) Petitioner will be granted fourteen days from the date of re-service of the findings and 7 recommendations in which to file his written objections, if any to the findings and 8 recommendations. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.