(PC) Valdez v. Beard et al, No. 1:2014cv01839 - Document 99 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 88 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/22/2018: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff, 13 14 1:14-cv-01839-AWI-MJS (PC) RUBEN VALDEZ, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., (ECF No. 88) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 26, 2017, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations (ECF No. 88) to deny Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 79) of the order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54). No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s case. The Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 2 3 4 5 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations issued December 26, 2017 are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: March 22, 2018 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.