(HC) Gutierrez v. Lackner, No. 1:2014cv01834 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 17 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/15/2017. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 SALVADOR FERNANDO GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS 14 15 16 17 Case No. 1:14-cv-01834-DAD-MJS v. (Doc. 17) HEIDI M. LACKNER, Warden, Respondent. 18 19 Petitioner has requested an extension of time in which to file objections to the 20 Court’s Findings and Recommendation. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Petitioner’s 21 motion is granted. Petitioner is provided thirty (30) days from the issuance of this order in 22 which to file objections to the Findings and Recommendation. 23 Petitioner also seeks explanation of the Court’s order entitled “Findings and 24 Recommendation”. That Order contains the Court’s factual and legal findings. Here, it 25 found that Petitioner’s claims lacked merit and that Petitioner was not entitled to habeas 26 relief. Based on those findings, the Order also included the Magistrate Judge’s 27 recommendation to the District Court Judge that the petition be denied. 28 1 1 2 Petitioner, in his objections, should address any and all portions of the Findings and Recommendation that he believes were wrongly reasoned or decided. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 15, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
