(PC) Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. Redding, et al, No. 1:2014cv00706 - Document 178 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 177 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER DISMISSING this action without prejudice, due to plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action and failure to keep the court apprised of his current address, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/17/2020. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 REDDING, et al., 15 No. 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 177) 16 17 18 At the time this action was filed, plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee 19 proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred 20 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 13, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, because of 23 plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this case and failure to keep the court apprised of his correct 24 address in compliance with Local Rule 183(b). (Doc. No. 177.) 25 The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any 26 objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of service. (Id.) To 27 date, no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed with the court, and the 28 time in which to do so has now passed. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 3 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, 5 1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 13, 2020 (Doc. No. 177) are 6 7 adopted in full; 2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this 8 9 10 11 12 action and failure to keep the court apprised of his current address; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.