(PC) Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. Redding, et al, No. 1:2014cv00706 - Document 135 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER re Plaintiff's 134 Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/14/19. (Gonzalez, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY ELL SHEHEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 REDDING, et al., 15 16 17 18 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS FILED JANUARY 11, 2019 [ECF No. 134] At the time this action was filed, Plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On December 27, 2018, the Court vacated the Findings and Recommendations which 20 recommended dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file 21 an opposition to Defendants’ pending motion for an order declaring him a vexatious litigant. 22 On January 11, 2019, Plaintiff again filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 (ECF No. 134.) The Court’s November 27, 2018, the Findings and Recommendations have been 24 vacated based on his first set of objections filed on December 26, 2018, and Plaintiff’s opposition to 25 Defendants’ pending motion is due on or before January 28, 2019. Plaintiff is again advised to focus 26 his attention and actions on filing an opposition to Defendants’ motion in order to ensure the efficient 27 resolution of this case, and any further extensions of time will only be granted upon a showing of 28 extraordinary circumstances. Furthermore, because it is apparent that Plaintiff can prosecute this 1 1 action, the Court will not vacate any future Findings and Recommendations or other orders for 2 Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the applicable deadlines. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 January 14, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
