(PC) Hawkins v. Ibarra et al, No. 1:2014cv00009 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendations Regarding Denial Of Plaintiff's Motion For Enforcement Of Court Orders And Affirmative Relief Related To Use Of Force And Disciplinary Measures (ECF Nos. 24 , 26 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/6/2015. (Fahrney, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 HOMER EARL HAWKINS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 v. S. IBARRA, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:14-cv-00009-AWI-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDERS AND AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE AND DISCIPLINARY MEASURES (ECF Nos. 24, 26) 15 Plaintiff Homer Earl Hawkins (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 16 17 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action was removed to this Court on January 2, 2014. 18 On April 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 19 Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were 20 served on the parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen 21 (14) days. (ECF No. 26.) More than fourteen days have passed and no objections have been 22 filed. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 24 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 25 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations, issued on April 14, 2015, are adopted in full; and 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July 6, 2015 5 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
