(PC) Brown v. Gipson et al, No. 1:2013cv02084 - Document 65 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER VACATING the January 10, 2018 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion 64 for Extension of Time to File Objections to the Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/2/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WILLIAM BROWN, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. W. RASLEY, Defendant. 14 15 Case No. 1:13-cv-02084-AWI-BAM (PC) ORDER VACATING THE JANUARY 10, 2018 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 63) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 64) 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff William Brown is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2017, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and 20 recommendations recommending dismissal of certain claims and defendants in this case. (ECF 21 No. 53.) The findings and recommendations stated that the parties had fourteen (14) days to file 22 any written objections. (Id. at 13.) No objections were filed within the time permitted. On January 23 10, 2018, the Court adopted the findings and recommendations in full. (ECF No. 63.) 24 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections 25 to the findings and recommendations, with a proof of service dated January 8, 2018. (ECF No. 26 64.) Plaintiff states that due to mail delays and a hospitalization, he did not receive the findings 27 and recommendations until January 3, 2018, after the deadline to file any objections had passed. 28 He then promptly mailed the instant motion requesting an extension of time to file objections. 1 1 Under the circumstances, the Court finds good cause for an extension of time. Therefore, 2 the Court will vacate its January 10, 2018 order adopting the findings and recommendations, and 3 grant Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file any objections to the findings and 4 recommendations. 5 Plaintiff also states that defense counsel contacted him regarding a stay that he declined, 6 and he has attached a first set of interrogatories to the motion. He seeks for the Court to “take 7 notice” of these issues. The Court informs the parties that, generally, discovery requests should 8 not be filed with the Court unless they are the subject of a motion. Further, the parties need not 9 inform the Court of rejected stipulations. No relief being requested in regard to this matter, there 10 is no action for the Court to take at this time. 11 12 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. 14 15 The Court’s January 10, 2018 order adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations (ECF No. 63) is VACATED; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections to the December 12, 16 2017 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 64) is GRANTED and Plaintiff 17 may file objections on or before thirty (30) days from the date of this order. 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 2, 2018 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.