(PC) Pino v. Ladd et al, No. 1:2013cv01593 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Denying 21 Plaintiff's Request for Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/14/15. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Thirty-Day Objection Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID PINO, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. LADD, et el., Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:13cv01593 LJO DLB (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (Document 21) THIRTY-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE Plaintiff David Pino (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on October 3, 2013. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First 19 Amended Complaint against Defendants Ladd, Musselman, Hernandez, Lee, Moore and Watson for 20 violation of the First Amendment. 21 On February 20, 2015, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff’s 22 failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. The motion is ready for decision. 23 On April 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Plaintiff indicated that he is 24 “unable to further litigate this case by circumstances beyond his control,” and requested that any 25 dismissal be without prejudice. ECF No. 21, at 1. 26 The Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s request on April 16, 2015. Defendants 27 filed their response on May 6, 2015. Defendants object to an unconditional dismissal without 28 1 1 prejudice because such a dismissal would delay final resolution in the event Plaintiff re-filed this 2 action. Defendants request that the dismissal be with prejudice. Alternatively, Defendants request 3 that any dismissal without prejudice be conditioned on (1) Plaintiff paying Defendants’ costs for this 4 action if he refiles this action, and (2) staying any subsequent proceedings until Plaintiff has complied. 5 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(d). As Defendants have appeared in this action, the action may be dismissed at Plaintiff’s request 6 7 only by Court order, and only on terms that the Court considers just and proper. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 8 41(a)(2). Given that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is pending and may be dispositive of 9 10 this action, the Court agrees that a dismissal without prejudice unfairly hinders Defendants’ ability to 11 resolve this action in their favor. Moreover, Plaintiff’s status as a pro se prisoner proceeding in forma 12 pauperis makes it unlikely that he will be able to pay costs for this action should he refile. Therefore, the Court finds that there are no just or proper terms to make dismissal appropriate 13 14 at this stage. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 15 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary 16 17 dismissal be DENIED. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 18 19 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days 20 after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, the parties may file written objections 21 with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 1 Recommendations.” A party may respond to another party’s objections by filing a response within 2 fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of that party’s objections. The parties are advised 3 that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 4 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis May 14, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.