(PC) Cortinas v. Gipson et al, No. 1:2013cv01229 - Document 102 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 66 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 62 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order Directing Action by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Officials signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/24/2015. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. M. PORTILLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:13-cv-01229-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT ORDER DIRECTING ACTION BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION OFFICIALS [ECF Nos. 62, 66] Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On March 27, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 20 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that objections to the Findings and 21 Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on April 13, 2015. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 23 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, 24 the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 25 analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on March 27, 2015, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order directing action by California Department of 4 Corrections and Rehabilitation officials is DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: June 24, 2015 8 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.