USA v. Approximately $93,500.00 in U.S. Currency, No. 1:2013cv01225 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT of FORFEITURE, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/30/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HEATHER MARDEL JONES Assistant United States Attorney 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 15 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE v. 13 14 CASE NO. 1:13-CV-01225-AWI-SKO APPROXIMATELY $93,500.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant. 16 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herewith, the Court 17 18 19 20 21 finds: 1. This is a civil forfeiture action against Approximately $93,500.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”). 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed on August 6, 2013, alleging 22 that said defendant currency is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). 23 3. On August 9, 2013, the Clerk issued a Warrant for Arrest for the defendant 24 25 currency. The warrant for the defendant currency was duly executed on August 15, 2013. 4. Beginning on August 11, 2013, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United States 26 published notice of this action on the official government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov. A 27 Declaration of Publication was filed on January 22, 2014. 28 5. In addition to public notice on the official internet government forfeiture site Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 1 www.forfeiture.gov, actual notice or attempted notice was given to the following individuals: 2 a. Edy Salazar 3 b. Mario Moreno 4 c. Matthew Lombard, attorney 5 6. Potential Claimant Edy Salazar filed a claim with the Drug Enforcement 6 Administration (DEA) in the administrative proceeding. To date, no other parties have filed 7 either administrative or judicial claims or answers in this matter, and the time in which any 8 person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 9 7. On February 27, 2014, the United States sought and obtained a Clerk’s Entry of 10 Default against Mario Moreno. On May 16, 2014, the Court granted the United States Motion 11 for Default against Mario Moreno. 12 8. Potential Claimant represents and warrants that he is the sole owner of the 13 defendant currency and that no other person or entity has any legitimate claim of interest 14 therein. 15 9. 16 No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time for which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 17 Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby 18 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 19 1. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by 20 21 22 23 and between the parties to this action. 2. That judgment is hereby entered against Potential Claimant Edy Salazar, Mario Moreno and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. 3. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein $83,215.00 of the defendant 24 currency of approximately $93,500.00, together with any interest that has accrued on the 25 entire amount of defendant currency, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 26 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law. 27 28 4. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein, but no later than 60 days after Potential Claimant has provided the necessary electronic funds transfer paperwork, Final Judgment of Forfeiture 2 1 $10,285.00 of the defendant currency of approximately $93,500.00, shall be returned to 2 Potential Claimant through his attorney Matthew J. Lombard, at The Law Offices of Matthew 3 J. Lombard, 2115 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90405, telephone (310) 399-3259. 5. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees, 4 5 and all other Public entities, their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and 6 all liability, arising out of or in any way connected with the seizure, arrest, or forfeiture of the 7 defendant currency. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and 8 unanticipated injuries, and/or damages arising out of said seizure, arrest, or forfeiture, as well 9 as to those now known or disclosed. The parties waived the provisions of California Civil Code 10 § 1542. 11 6. That pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and the allegations set forth in the 12 Complaint filed on or about August 6, 2013, the Court finds that there was reasonable cause 13 for the seizure and arrest of the defendant currency, and for the commencement and 14 prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 15 U.S.C. § 2465 shall be entered accordingly. 7. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into between 16 17 the parties, no party “substantially prevailed” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2465. All 18 parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Final Judgment of Forfeiture 3 1 2 8. The Court shall maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture. 3 4 5 6 7 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE 8 Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed 9 August 6, 2013, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herewith, this 10 Court enters this Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there 11 was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the defendant funds, and for the 12 commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: June 30, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.