(PC) Armstrong v. Pelayo, et al, No. 1:2013cv01048 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DENYING Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Docs. 5 , 8 , 16 , 17 ) signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/14/2014. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRADY K. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 v. Case No. 1:13-cv-01048-AWI-SKO (PC) ORDER (1) ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND (2) DENYING MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF D. PELAYO, (Docs. 5, 8, 16, 17, and 25) 14 15 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 18 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 8, 2013. The matter was referred 19 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations 21 recommending Plaintiff’s various motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. Plaintiff did 22 not file an Objection. Local Rule 304(b). 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 25 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 27 28 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 14, 2014 (Doc. No. 25), is adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on July 8, 2013 (Doc. No. 5 5), July 22, 2013 (Doc. No. 8), and September 5, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), are 6 DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 14, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.