(PC) Beteta v. Cate et al, No. 1:2013cv00746 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending to Dismiss this Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/23/14. Referred to Judge Ishii; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE N. BETETA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING TO DISMISS THIS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MATTHEW CATE, et al., 14 Case No. 1:13-cv-00746-AWI-DLB PC Defendants. (ECF No.16) 15 16 Plaintiff Jose N. Beteta (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department 17 of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2014, the Court issued an order 19 dismissing the complaint, with leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff 20 was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and was cautioned that the failure to do so would 21 result in the dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. Id. More than thirty days has passed, 22 and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is 23 no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, 24 25 based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after 3 being served with these Findings and Recommendations, the parties may file written objections with 4 the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and 5 Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 6 may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th 7 Cir. 1991). 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis June 23, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.