Paul Weldon v. Dyer et al, No. 1:2013cv00540 - Document 87 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations 86 and DENYING 79 Motion to Strike, Signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/3/2014. (Arellano, S.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PAUL WELDON, Plaintiff, 5 6 7 Case No. 1:13-cv-00540-LJO-SAB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ECF NO. 79, 86 JERRY DYER, et al., Defendants. 8 9 On October 24, 2014, the magistrate judge assigned to this action issued a Findings and 10 Recommendations recommending that Defendant’s motion to strike be denied. (ECF No. 86.) 11 The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within 12 thirty (30) days. To date, no party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 13 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 14 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 15 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 16 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 17 1. The October 24, 2014 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL 18 (ECF No. 86); and 19 2. Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill December 3, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
