Nawabi v. Cates, et al., No. 1:2013cv00272 - Document 59 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER re 58 Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations and to Extend the Page Limit for Objections signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/1/2015. Objections to F&R due by 6/17/2015. Responses to Objections due by 7/8/2015. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600 Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903 8 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 IDRIS NAWABI , Plaintiff, 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER v. 15 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., 16 Case No. 1:13-cv- 00272-LJO-SAB GOVERNOR; JEFFREY BEARD, SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION (“CDCR”); JAMES D. HARTLEY, WARDEN OF THE AVENAL STATE PRISON (“ASP”); R. CHAPNICK, ASP CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, M.D.; B. BORGES, ASP REGISTERED NURSE; HANCOCK, ASP CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, , Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER 1 2 The Court has reviewed the stipulation of the parties and finds good cause to 3 extend the deadline to file objections to the Magistrate’s Findings and 4 Recommendations (Doc. 56), as well as extend the page limit for those objections, 5 and thus Orders as follows: 6 (1) The deadline to file any objections to the Magistrate’s Findings and 7 Recommendations (Doc. 56) shall be June 17, 2015; 8 (2) The objections shall be no more than thirty-five (35) pages in length, 9 excluding tables of contents and authorities; 21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600 Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903 10 (3) The deadline to file responses to objections to the Magistrate’s Findings 11 and Recommendations (Doc. 56) shall be July 8, 2015. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 1, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.