(PC) Felton v. Lopez, et al., No. 1:2012cv01066 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER DENYING 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; ORDER ADOPTING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/21/2013. (Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KELVIN FELTON, 9 10 11 Plaintiff, vs. J. LOPEZ, et al., 12 Defendants. 1:12-cv-01066-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 13.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 3.) 13 ______________________________/ 14 15 Kelvin Felton (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 16 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On February 13, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 19 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction be denied. (Doc. 13.) Plaintiff was provided an 20 opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, 21 Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 23 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 24 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 13, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, filed on June 29, 2012, is DENIED. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 DEAC_Signature-END: 0m8i788 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
