(PC) Lewis v. Alison et al, No. 1:2012cv00856 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 45 Regarding Denial of Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction 44 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/27/14. (Verduzco, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Lewis v. Alison et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 HOMER TYRONE LEWIS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 v. KATHLEEN ALISON, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv-00856-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DENIAL OF MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF Nos. 44, 45) 15 Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 16 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On June 6, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 19 Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction be 20 denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 21 any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF No. 70.) More than 22 fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 23 24 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the 25 Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations, issued on June 6, 2014, are adopted in full; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order and/or 2 preliminary injunction is DENIED. 3 SO ORDERED Dated: June 27, 2014 4 5 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
