(PC) Williams v. Cates et al, No. 1:2012cv00730 - Document 71 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION And Dismissing Defendant Marisol From The Action (ECF Nos. 66 , 67 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/31/2014. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 23, 2014, are ADOPTED in full. Defendant Marisol is DISMISSED from the action without prejudice.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HORACE MANN WILLIAMS, 12 Case No. 1:12-cv-00730 LJO DLB PC Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT MARISOL FROM THE ACTION MARISOL, et al., 15 [ECF Nos. 66, 67] Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Horace Mann Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On October 23, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 20 recommended Defendant Marisol be DISMISSED from the action for failure to effect service of 21 process. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice 22 that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Over thirty days have passed and no 23 party has filed objections. However, on October 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss 24 Defendant Marisol from the action without prejudice. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 26 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 27 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 23, 2014, are ADOPTED in full; 2 2. Defendant Marisol is DISMISSED from the action without prejudice. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill October 31, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.