Baker v. Yates, No. 1:2012cv00126 - Document 67 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 65 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/2013. Motion 64 is Denied. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARVEY CURTIS BAKER, Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-LJO-SAB Plaintiff, 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 13 ECF NO. 65 14 JAMES A. YATES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 1, 2013, the magistrate judge assigned to this action issued a Findings and 18 Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff Harvey Curtis Baker’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 19 injunctive relief and/or appointment of counsel be denied. (ECF No. 65.) The Findings and 20 Recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. 21 No party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 23 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 24 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 2 1. FULL; and 3 4 The November 1, 2013 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and/or appointment of counsel is DENIED. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill December 9, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
