-GBC (PC) Puckett v. Corcoran Prison - CDCR, et al., No. 1:2011cv01565 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; and Denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion for TRO signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/20/2012. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GBC (PC) Puckett v. Corcoran Prison - CDCR, et al. Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, CASE NO: 1:11-cv-01565-LJO-GBC (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 12 v. 13 CORCORAN PRISON - CDCR, et al., 14 Docs. 10, 12 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On June 14, 2011, Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding 18 pro se, filed this civil rights action in California Superior Court, County of Kings, pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. On September 13, 2011, Defendants removed this action to Federal Court. 20 Id. On October 27, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against prison 21 officials at Corcoran State Prison. The Court construed this as a motion for preliminary injunction. 22 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 23 and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 24 Recommendations, recommending denying Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order. Doc. 25 12. Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 8, 2012, are ADOPTED, in full; and 4 2. 5 Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order, filed October 27, 2011, is DENIED. 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 April 20, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
