-DLB Harris v. O'Keefe et al, No. 1:2011cv01553 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus and 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/18/11. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
-DLB Harris v. O'Keefe et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 DONALD O’KEEFE; and U.S. MARSHAL, 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11cv01553 LJO DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 20) 16 Plaintiff Christopher Harris (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner appearing pro se and 17 proceeding in forma pauperis, filed the instant action on September 14, 2011. He filed a first 18 amended complaint on September 19, 2011. Thereafter, he filed an application for writ of habeas 19 corpus and a motion for preliminary injunction. Docs. 18 and 19. 20 On October 4, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 21 Plaintiff’s application for writ of habeas corpus and him motion for preliminary injunction be 22 DENIED. The Findings and Recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice 23 that any objections were to be filed within twenty (21) days. On October 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a 26 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 27 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued October 4, 2011, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 4 2. Plaintiff’s application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 5 3. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 66h44d October 18, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.