(PC) Bryant v. Gallagher et al, No. 1:2011cv00446 - Document 191 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 189 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 188 Motion for Court Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/15/2015. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. P. GALLAGHER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:11-cv-00446-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT ORDER (ECF Nos. 188, 189) Plaintiff Kevin Darnell Bryant (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 21 March 17, 2011. A settlement conference is scheduled for June 2, 2015. 22 On April 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 23 Plaintiff’s motion for a court order be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the 24 parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after 25 service. (ECF No. 189.) More than fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 28 recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on April 21, 2015, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order, filed on April 8, 2015, is HEREBY DENIED. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill May 15, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
