(PC) Goolsby v. Gonzales et al, No. 1:2011cv00394 - Document 39 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Default Judgment, with Prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/12/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THOMAS GOOLSBY, 11 12 13 14 1:11-cv-00394-LJO-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 33.) vs. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 32.) FERNANDO GONZALES, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 Thomas Goolsby (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 21 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On April 25, 2014, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 23 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendant Steadman be denied. (Doc. 33.) On 24 May 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 34.) 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 27 including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 4 2014, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. 5 6 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 25, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendant Steadman, filed on April 23, 2014, is DENIED with prejudice; and 3. 7 No other motions for entry of default or default judgment against defendant Steadman shall be considered by the court in this action. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 12, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.