-MJS (PC) Williams v. The State of California et al, No. 1:2011cv00182 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 2 Plaintiff's Petition for an Emergency Injunction, signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/22/2011. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-MJS (PC) Williams v. The State of California et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONALD B. WILLIAMS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 11 1:11-cv-00182-OWW-MJS (PC) Defendants. (ECF No. 17) 12 13 _______________________________/ 14 Plaintiff Donald B. Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights 15 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 17 On July 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation, 18 recommending that Plaintiff's Petition for an Emergency Injunction be Denied. (ECF No. 17.) 19 Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Findings and Recommendation. 20 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this 21 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 22 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 23 analysis. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 27, 2011, is adopted in full; and 4 2. Plaintiff's Petition for an Emergency Injunction is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: September 22, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
