-GSA (PC) Marsh v. Brown et al, No. 1:2010cv02353 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 17 , ORDER Denying Motion to Compel 16 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/11. (Gonzalez, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GSA (PC) Marsh v. Brown et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE MARSH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. JERRY BROWN, et al., 15 16 17 Defendants. _____________________________/ 1:10-cv-02353-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 17.) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL RETURN OF WORD PROCESSOR (Doc. 16.) Lawrence Marsh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 27, 2011, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 Plaintiff's motion to compel the return of his word processor, filed on October 25, 2011, be denied. 22 (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 23 recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise 24 responded to the findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 27, 2011, are ADOPTED in full; and 4 2. 5 Plaintiff's motion to compel the return of his word processor, filed on October 25, 2011, is DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 December 9, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
