-DLB (PC) Cortinas v. Lockwood et al, No. 1:2010cv02270 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER DENYING 7 Motion ; ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/5/11. (Martin-Gill, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-DLB (PC) Cortinas v. Lockwood et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, 9 1:10-CV-02270-OWW-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION CONSTRUED AS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 10 v. 11 TIMOTHY LOCKWOOD, et al., (DOC. 9) 12 Defendants. 13 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Larry William Cortinas (“Plaintiff”) is a California 17 state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed 19 a motion for the return of his typewriter and supplies. 20 The Court construed the motion as one for preliminary injunction. 21 The matter 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. was referred to a United States Doc. 7. Magistrate Judge 23 On June 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and 24 Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and which contained 25 notice 26 Recommendations was to be filed within eighteen days. 27 did 28 Recommendations. to not Plaintiff file a that timely any objection Objection to to the the Findings and Plaintiff Findings and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), 2 this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 3 carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 4 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 5 analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Having 8 9 The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 3, 2011, is adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion, filed January 14, 2011, is denied. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: August 5, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
