(PC)Quezada v. Lindsey et al, No. 1:2010cv01402 - Document 77 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 67 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING Defendants' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Lindsey and Gonzalez and GRANTING as to Defendant Patel signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/18/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALVARO QUEZADA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. R. LINDSEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:10-cv-01402-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO LINDSEY AND GONZALEZ AND GRANTING AS TO DEFENDANT PATEL [ECF Nos. 50, 67] Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations regarding 19 20 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment relating to exhaustion of the administrative remedies. 21 (ECF No. 67.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice 22 to the parties that objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on March 2, 23 2015, and Defendants filed a response on March 16, 2015. Local Rule 304(b), (d). 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 25 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, 26 the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 6, 2015, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Defendants Lindsey and 4 Gonzalez and GRANTED as to Defendant Patel; 5 3. 6 the administrative remedies; and 7 4. Defendant Patel is dismissed from the action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 18, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.