(PC) Wilson v. Perkinson et al, No. 1:2010cv01086 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action without Prejudice; Objections, if any, Due within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/11/12. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 1/30/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Wilson v. Perkinson et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 HELDA WILSON, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:10-CV-01086-LJO-DLB PC Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. R. PERKINSON, et al., 12 (DOCS. 2, 3) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 13 / 14 15 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on June 16, 16 2010. Plaintiff did not pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis, and on June 17, 2010, the Court ordered Plaintiff to do so within forty-five days. Doc. 3. 18 More than forty-five days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order. 19 Plaintiff was warned that failure to obey the order would result in dismissal of the action. On June 20 16, 2010, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff either to consent or decline jurisdiction by a 21 magistrate judge in this action. Doc. 2. Plaintiff has also not submitted whether she consents or 22 declines magistrate judge jurisdiction. 23 A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or an application 24 to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff has submitted neither and 25 has not responded to the Court’s order to do so, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re 26 Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); 27 Local Rule 110. 28 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, without 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and for 2 failure to submit the form notifying the Court whether she consents or declines magistrate judge 3 jurisdiction. 4 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) days 6 after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, the Plaintiff may file written 7 objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 8 Findings and Recommendations.” The Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 9 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 10 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: 3b142a January 11, 2012 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.