(PC) Pierce v. Lopez et al, No. 1:2010cv00486 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/3/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Pierce v. Lopez et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SEBREN A. PIERCE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-486-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. LOPEZ, et al., (ECF Nos. 13 & 15) 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Sebren A. Pierce, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 16 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On December 23, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation 19 recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff 20 was notified that any objections to this recommendation were due within thirty days. More than 21 thirty days have passed and no objections have been filed. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this Court 23 has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court 24 finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 23, 2010, is adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 13) is DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 0m8i78 February 3, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.