-SKO (HC) Jones v. Tate, No. 1:2010cv00068 - Document 35 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 ; ORDER DENYING Petitioner's Request for an Order to Prison Staff to Return His Property 22 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/11/11. (Hellings, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-SKO (HC) Jones v. Tate Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 FREDRICK JONES JR., 10 Petitioner, 11 12 13 v. DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS MATTHEW TATE, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv—00068-AWI-SKO-HC ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 33) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO PRISON STAFF TO RETURN HIS PROPERTY (Doc. 22) 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a 18 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. 21 On July 7, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a 22 recommendation that Petitioner’s request for an order to prison 23 staff to return his property be denied. 24 The findings and recommendations were served on all parties 25 on the same date. 26 parties that objections could be filed within thirty days, and 27 replies within fourteen days after the filing of objections. 28 Although the time period for filing objections has passed, no The findings and recommendations advised the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 3 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 4 The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and has 5 determined that the report and recommendation is supported by the 6 record and proper analysis. 7 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 8 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on July 7, 2011, 9 10 are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Petitioner’s motion for an order to staff to return his 11 legal property is DENIED. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: 0m8i78 September 11, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
