(PC) Salazar v. Sullivan, et al., No. 1:2009cv02264 - Document 37 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 26 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/20/2013. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Salazar v. Sullivan, et al. Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 EDDIE SALAZAR, 12 CASE No. 1:09-cv-2264-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 (ECF Nos. 26, 36) SULLIVAN, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 / 19 20 21 On December 31, 2009, Plaintiff Eddie Salazar, a state prisoner proceeding pro 22 se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 23 (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 24 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for the 25 26 Eastern District of California. 27 -1- Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 On February 1, 2013, Findings and Recommendation were filed in which the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) be denied. (ECF No. 36.) 4 5 6 7 The parties were notified that objection, if any, was due within fourteen days after service. No party filed an objection to the Findings and Recommendation. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has 8 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 9 Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by 10 proper analysis. 11 12 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2013, (ECF No. 36) in full; and 14 15 The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendation filed February 1, 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) is DENIED. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: 0m8i78 March 20, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
