Lai v. Ipson et al, No. 1:2009cv02086 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Dismissing Action, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/6/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lai v. Ipson et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS CHAN LAI, 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MRS. IPSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) _____________________________________ ) 1:09-CV-02086 AWI GSA ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (Document 10) 16 17 Plaintiff Dennis Chan Lai, a federal prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this action filed on November 30, 2009. (Doc. 1.) 19 On March 10, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that the 20 action be DISMISSED without leave to amend. Initially the Findings were adopted in full by this 21 Court on April 28, 2010 (Doc. 11); however, on May 10, 2010, the Court learned that Plaintiff 22 had not been properly served with Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. Thus, 23 this Court set aside the April 28, 2010, judgement, ordered that Plaintiff be served with the 24 Findings and Recommendations, and provided Plaintiff with an additional thirty days within 25 which to file objections. (Doc. 14.) 26 On May 27, 2010, Plaintiff sought an extension of time from the Court, and the 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Magistrate Judge ordered that Plaintiff be given through and including July 1, 2010, within 2 which to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations issued March 10, 2010. (Docs. 3 15 & 16.) Nevertheless, as of this date, no party has sought a further extension or filed 4 objections. 5 In accordance with the provisions of Title 28 of the United States Code section 636 6 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the 7 entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record 8 and proper analysis. 9 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 11 The Findings and Recommendations dated March 10, 2010, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 12 2. The action is DISMISSED. 13 This terminates this action in its entirety. 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: 0m8i78 July 6, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
