(PC) Green v. David et al, No. 1:2009cv01747 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and Denying Plaintiff's 20 21 Request for Temporary Restraining Order signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/10/2010. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Green v. David et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 VENCIL C. GREEN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01747-AWI-GBC PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER v. B. S. DAVID, et al., (Docs. 20, 21, 23) 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Vencil Green, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 17 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 12, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (Doc. 23.) Neither party filed an 22 objection. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 25 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed October 12, 2010, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order filed September 10 and 29, 2010 4 5 are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: 0m8i78 December 10, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
